MY HYPOTHESIS was that Geno would show a higher Amerindian result, which it did. Using most of the GEDmatch calculators on the AncestryDNA data yields a result of 1.8 (as Doug McDonald’s results did). When I ran the Geno 2.0 data in R using World9, it reported a 2.3 percent Amerindian result. The FTDNA result is somewhat lower, although, when I did do Oracle X using FTDNA (before they discontinued it, I got very similar results to McDonald’s analysis).
1. Mixed Germanic 90.84% 2. Sardinian 6.43% 3. Ecuadorian 1.45% 4. AthabaskHD4 1.22% 5. MEX30 .02% 6. Colombian .02%
Pct. Option 2 yielded somewhat different results:
1. Mixed Germanic 89.1% 2. Sardinian 4.95% 3. Ecuadorian 3.53% 4. Aragon 2.29% 5, Ethiopian Jews .01%
And McDonald’s analysis on Geno 2.0 data.
This analysis uses only 57785 markers and is quite noisy.
Most likely fit is 95.5% (+- 5.8%) Europe (all Western Europe)
and 3.2% (+- 5.6%) Europe (various subcontinents)
which is 98.7% total Europe
and 0.0% (+- 0.0%) Mideast (various subcontinents)
and 1.3% (+- 0.3%) America (various subcontinents)
The following are possible population sets and their fractions,
most likely at the top
French= 0.510 English= 0.473 Iranian= 0.000 Na-Dene= 0.017 or
French= 0.699 Irish= 0.286 Georgian= 0.000 Na-Dene= 0.015 or
French= 0.832 Lithuani= 0.151 Druze= 0.000 Na-Dene= 0.017 or
French= 0.662 Irish= 0.329 Mozabite= 0.000 Maya= 0.009 or
French= 0.660 Irish= 0.331 Armenian= 0.000 Columbia= 0.009 or
French= 0.465 English= 0.524 Georgian= 0.000 Maya= 0.012 or
French= 0.464 English= 0.526 Jewish= 0.000 Columbia= 0.011 or
French= 0.883 Finland= 0.103 Armenian= 0.000 Na-Dene= 0.014
It’s a small result, but keep in mind we are dealing with DNA from Native American ancestors who lived in the late 18th century and early 19th centuries on the coast of North Carolina. As far as I know, nobody has sampled indigenous DNA from this region (and no one can anymore, as most of the local Native Americans are so admixed). The fact that Athabaskan results are continuously higher than Mayan/South American results shows me that the Native Americans living in this area were perhaps more similar to the Athabaskan populations than to the South American ones. I do have census and other data that shows ancestors with a racial designation other than white. This is why these small results are interesting to me.
Likewise these small results are actually being generated by data on just a few chromosomes. Most chromosomes show almost zero Native American results. Chromosome 22 on Geno 2.0 shows 11.2 percent Native American. Chromosome 22 on AncestryDNA shows 7.5 percent Native American.
This supports my hypothesis: that Geno 2.0 is actually more sensitive to Native American admixture than AncestryDNA or FTDNA.